Bloodbath

  • Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

Sir Royal

Experienced
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
429
Reaction score
227
I wish the bloodbath was more of a bloodbath, if your lucky 2-3 people might die, and that's it.

When MCSG first started I think it was around 13-14.


WHAT HAPPENED.
 

RC_4777

Mockingjay
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
10,403
Reaction score
10,589
People became cleverer and started avoiding bloodbaths
Yep. Now people are smarter. But with the tier 1 chests at corn on breeze there is a bit more of a bloodbath because there are more weapons.
 

funnybunny

Peacekeeper
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
726
They should make it item frames at corn instead of chests.
 

duckluv321

District 13
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
8,463
Why do we need a bloodbath...?
I think we are better off this way, for two reasons.

The forums.
The forums would be absolutely spammed if we had this huge no-survivors bloodbath.
We would have threads like "Get rid of the weapons at spawn!" Spammed across the forums much like "Get rid of donor privileges!" threads.

We would more than likely lose members of the community.
A huge bloodbath at the beginning, killing numerous people would be absolutely chaotic.
People would just stop going to the cornucopia in general, leaving whoever did to all the chests, and leaving them to be pretty OP.
People would hate that, and we could even lose a few players from it, quitting because of the quick death.

TL;DR- I don't know how we would even make it more of a bloodbath, and if we could, we really shouldn't as there are more negatives than positives in the situation.
 

Sir Royal

Experienced
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
429
Reaction score
227
Why do we need a bloodbath...?
I think we are better off this way, for two reasons.

The forums.
The forums would be absolutely spammed if we had this huge no-survivors bloodbath.
We would have threads like "Get rid of the weapons at spawn!" Spammed across the forums much like "Get rid of donor privileges!" threads.

We would more than likely lose members of the community.
A huge bloodbath at the beginning, killing numerous people would be absolutely chaotic.
People would just stop going to the cornucopia in general, leaving whoever did to all the chests, and leaving them to be pretty OP.
People would hate that, and we could even lose a few players from it, quitting because of the quick death.

TL;DR- I don't know how we would even make it more of a bloodbath, and if we could, we really shouldn't as there are more negatives than positives in the situation.

If the hunger games were real I don't think the crowd would be going

"WOW HOW DUMB THIS SHOW SUCKS EVERYTHINGS OP BOOOO"
 

Elisha

Peacekeeper
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
1,052
People started learning from videos posted all around the internet. All from there, they start to develop skills/tactics/strategies/learn how to play smart.
 

JoshBrennen

Survivor
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
70
Reaction score
71
The Bloodbath is part of the games, and the server but strategies have evolved and people have different chest routes which could easily give them the same amount of armour protection, loot and weapons than they could get at spawn. It has an added benefit of the risk of dying is lower as less people are there.

It also depends on the people who get the weapons at spawn. There are people who will get the weapon e.g stone sword and will immediately run for their chest route. There are people who will kill maybe 1 or 2 people then go for a chest route but there are also people who will get a sword and kill as many people as they can collecting their loot from the corn instead of a chest route which is a risky strategy.
 

duckluv321

District 13
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
8,463
If the hunger games were real I don't think the crowd would be going

"WOW HOW DUMB THIS SHOW SUCKS EVERYTHINGS OP BOOOO"
.-.
That's a completely different situation though, and in reality it can't really be compared to the situation i talked about in my post.
Good point though.
 

Qualia

Diamond
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,809
Reaction score
1,369
Why do we need a bloodbath...?
I think we are better off this way, for two reasons.

The forums.
The forums would be absolutely spammed if we had this huge no-survivors bloodbath.
We would have threads like "Get rid of the weapons at spawn!" Spammed across the forums much like "Get rid of donor privileges!" threads.

We would more than likely lose members of the community.
A huge bloodbath at the beginning, killing numerous people would be absolutely chaotic.
People would just stop going to the cornucopia in general, leaving whoever did to all the chests, and
leaving them to be pretty OP.
People would hate that, and we could even lose a few players from it, quitting because of the quick death.

TL;DR- I don't know how we would even make it more of a bloodbath, and if we could, we really shouldn't as there are more negatives than positives in the situation.

Wowno.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,188
Messages
2,449,241
Members
523,962
Latest member
Atasci