Deathmatch problem...

[ProCryonicX]

Does anyone else think that it takes to long for deathmatch and that they should change it from 3 people to 4? I think this will make deathmatch and MCSG in general more fun to play... Like I was playing for so long because of the fact that I could not find people:

-Navid_16

 

[Blazerboy | Noah]

I totally understand. There are people who would prefer to have 4 person deathmatch, and i can definitely see why. in fact, I don't find any problems with it... other than the devs would have to redo that part of the plugin, and 4 man deathmatches allow for 2 teams to fight

 

[Makajoe]

I could not agree more, deathmatch should start with four people, I have been stuck numerous times trying to find just one more person to start dm.

 

[CommunityNightmare]

I wouldn't mind. It would just help the games end quicker and allow more games
to get in, so I don't see why not.

 

[arsenal]

I think it should depend on Map Size. Big maps like SG 1 that take an eternity to get down to three players, might as well start DMatch at 4, and small maps like Solar Frost that almost never come close to refill should start DMatch at two. Maps like Holiday and Valleyside should start at three, as they are medium size.
Edit: Nice Mac, and good idea BTW

 

[Iametal]

I'm ok with 3

 

[Deliciousfruit1]

No pls. Fighting teams of 3 in a flat arena where you can't really separate them or create a "choke point" for fire = not fun.

 

[_MK_]

Agreed. However, if there was a team of 3 in that D-match, it'd kinda unfair.

 

[Gustav Mahikano]

No pls. Fighting teams of 3 in a flat arena where you can't really separate them or create a "choke point" for fire = not fun.

With the arena getting smaller as time goes on I honestly don't see a way to win teams in deathmatches unless you out gear them, they're really bad or you get lucky. Best way before was to run away til they'd separate and take them out separately; you can't really do that anymore except on maps with a particular type of centre like Icarus, Breeze, etc. Even still it's quiet challenging.

 

[Rebound4]

Agreed. However, if there was a team of 3 in that D-match, it'd kinda unfair.

This is a really good point - taking on a team of 2 at dmatch is hard enough >.<

also the amount of times that sg1 and sg2 are played I don't think it's worth it really and the amount of work the devs would have to do to alter the plugin wouldn't be worth it :/

Nice idea though c:

 

[TheCornStealer]

Well... A team of 2 sounds more promising then a team of 3...

 

[mikag35]

YAY! If this gets implemented, I get to deal with 3 teams in deathmatch instead of 2! HOORAY!