Donors joining full lobbies

[Blazerboy | Noah]

I have to say this before the rest of this thread. I am not saying donors are bad. Donating really is good without the benefits, with the knowledge that you are giving money to support the servers and keeping them running. This is just a thread about a certain benefit.


So I've been a non-donor for a couple months now, and I gotta say, the fact that I haven't been able to join full lobbies isn't really a burden to me. Now that there are 200 servers for the US, if I don't find a empty server I just walk downstairs in the hub and quickly find at least 10 open games to play on. Now that being said, its not like the benefit of joining full lobbies isn't worth it. If you have a friend in a game, and the game is full, then you can join it and play with them. However, if you're a non-donor, you and your friend can simply leave the game, join a empty server and play together there

This obviously does not stop me from donating, and the only reason I am not a donor atm is because I don't have the money (saving for a new saxophone).

This obviously does not apply to EU servers, where there are not 200 servers to join and it is more difficult to get into a game as a non-donor (not really tho) when there isn't a hub.

So I want to know if this fact applies to other non-donors or if I am alone in this feeling.

 

[BlitzCometITU]

I don't understand the point of this thread. Didn't make much sense. If you're saying to nerf kicking privleges, no. That'll never happen.

 

[Zachary0614]

I don't understand the point of this thread. Didn't make much sense. If you're saying to nerf kicking privleges, no. That'll never happen.

I was a confused little zach as well.

 

[Blazerboy | Noah]

Oh, I guess it can look like it doesn't make sense. Basically I was asking if any non-donors also felt that the full lobby privilege was not needed ^-^

 

[BlitzCometITU]

So if donors can kick full lobbies? They can, and always will.

 

[Rebound4]

Oh, I guess it can look like it doesn't make sense. Basically I was asking if any non-donors also felt that the full lobby privilege was not needed ^-^

Then what privileges would be given instead? :3

 

[BlitzCometITU]

Then what privileges would be given instead? :3

He is saying there should be none.

 

[Rebound4]

He is saying there should be none.

He said what -.-

 

[Blazerboy | Noah]

nonono you guys, I'm saying that when I'm a donor, and I have the full lobby privilege, it doesn't matter if I do because when I'm NOT a donor, I can join a bunch of lobbies and there's never a full one that I want to be in

 

[BlitzCometITU]

nonono you guys, I'm saying that when I'm a donor, and I have the full lobby privilege, it doesn't matter if I do because when I'm NOT a donor, I can join a bunch of lobbies and there's never a full one that I want to be in

You're still saying it would be nerfed.

 

[TheSurvivalGamesCrew]

this is not making much sense to me either. are you just stating the obvious..... if so there really is no need to make this thread and I shall get a mod to close it before all the other donors see this and miss read what your saying and they will believe that you want donors nerfed. as blitz said that will never happen....

 

[Blazerboy | Noah]

No I don't want donors nerfed ;-;
Ok I'm going to try one last time. What I am saying is that non-donors can join lobbies without the full lobby privilege that donors have because there are so many servers. I AM NOT SAYING THAT DONORS SHOULD BE NERFED. I am saying that non-donors can get into games just as easily without kicking people as donors can with kicking people. It's just something I noticed.