Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
Awesome!This has been in the works for a while, I'll let someone else explain it a little better.
I don't recall hearing about that during the Q&A but it sounds great.In the Q and A they said that they were taking people from each of the build teams who would browse the maps in the maps section and pick the ones they thought were good and then Dave would bring the favorites up with Chad?
I could be mistaken.
It was a quick thing If I remember correctly. Someone asked how they would be picking maps in the future or how maps were chosen or if they were denied, something along those lines... and then Dave briefly explained the committee. I think this is a fantastic idea.I don't recall hearing about that during the Q&A but it sounds great.
Why would they remove that? I'd like to see them remove all of the PMC winners, Fortress Pyke, Kharmunrah, Fallen Empire and Treacherous Heights before they remove that map (so basically, I like it).They better not remove Survival Kingdom, if they do I will be so pissed....
Avaricia?Why would they remove that? I'd like to see them remove all of the PMC winners, Fortress Pyke, Kharmunrah, Fallen Empire and Treacherous Heights before they remove that map (so basically, I like it).
Maybe not. But definitely Fallen Colossi and Destiny's Shiver.Avaricia?
All the maps you listed at the end are good maps, they just don't get their share of votes >.< Fortress Pyke is great, Kharmunrah is at least decent (though all the lava in one area is annoying and how I can never seem to find a tier 2), Fallen Empire is a great map other than it's massive size and Treacherous Heights is also pretty good.Why would they remove that? I'd like to see them remove all of the PMC winners, Fortress Pyke, Kharmunrah, Fallen Empire and Treacherous Heights before they remove that map (so basically, I like it).