What is considered a "good" ratio in MCSG?

[Dusk]

168/1500+ ;-;

/resetstats

 

[Chocostarr]

Are ratios supposed to matter anyways?

I love the way your signature answers your own question xD

 

[Cat_On_A_Poptart]

I love the way your signature answers your own question xD

Haha, just noticed that xD

 

[endthebean]

The only thing that matters is wins, nothing else.

 

[Gamer101luke]

I think 15% Is actually good considering you have about a 5% chance of winning.

 

[Deliciousfruit1]

I think the ratios are a pretty bad way to measure skill anyways. Right now, I can win quite often, but I had pretty much no wins at all for entire months in a row when I started, so my ratio's probably abysmal forever. I'd pretty much have to win 2000 straight games in order to get anywhere close to a good ratio. The whole thing also gets screwed up just by getting an alt and restarting from 0/0 when you're already good at the game, so I could do it that way, but that's kinda cheap.

For example, I started sometime in June. I didn't get my first win until September. Granted, I wasn't playing a lot, but I must've done over a hundred games just running around finding random chests (or just getting chased and dying quickly), and being confused when that one guy with full iron just comes and destroys me. I eventually started winning more, but by now I'd have to get enough wins to break the top 50 on the leaderboards in order to get a 33% ratio.

 

[Torchy // aezlurr]

33% up is what I consider good.

And really.. Ratios don't matter, almost everyone that's high up with a good ratio win farms, massive teams, abused the win glitch, etc >.>

Thats really not true. Sure, they're are plenty who do so, but just because they have a good ratio doesn't mean they do that. I don't do that on Aezlurr and I have a good ratio. Mr_Smaha has a godlike ratio, and I know for a fact that he is just amazing. I feel like you may just be saying that because you can't get a ratio that high because of your 'terrible' internet.

 

[darkai202]

That's sad to hear because not everyone with decent ratios do that. If that's a common thought then people with decent ratios can get misunderstood.

Almost everyone

Thats really not true. Sure, they're are plenty who do so, but just because they have a good ratio doesn't mean they do that. I don't do that on Aezlurr and I have a good ratio. Mr_Smaha has a godlike ratio, and I know for a fact that he is just amazing. I feel like you may just be saying that because you can't get a ratio that high because of your 'terrible' internet.

I can name 10 players off the top of my head that 'cheated' to get their good ratio. I have an alternate count with a better ratio than Mr_Smaha (Granted I don't have a near amount of wins, but that's because I don't play it much)

Anyway, how do I come into this whatsoever? I've gotten my ratio up by 20% since I believe I became 'good' so don't say I can't get a good ratio, that's a pathetic argument. I legitimately mean it when I say that most players with a good ratio do not get it legit.

Also, to top it off I never said players like Quackeryy or yourself cheaply get your wins, you automatically went defensive and had a tantrum about how you are good and have a good ratio, and I must be bad because I don't.

EDIT: Now I look at your stats, you play a lot on the high servers, I'm not going to call you bad or anything but that is a very easy way of farming wins/getting your w/l up.

 

[Fuzzycookie]

I'd say most likely, around a 2-3 is godlike, 4-5 is good, 6-7 okay, 8-9 need to improve, 10+ you suck at life

 

[BlueHeron]

A lot of people with good ratios, are alts.

 

[Joel/MadDawg]

I think for an average person a good ratio is 10%, but for the forum community probably 25%.

 

[FuSioN]

Ratios don't really matter because most people suck when they first started (me). The ratio on my current account is 1/4 (On my original account it was even worse lol) but if I made a new account now I could probably maintain a 1/2 ratio.